�������ϲʹ���ֱ��

• Alicia Spencer-Hall, University College, London, UK, Series Editor
• Blake Gutt, University of Utah, USA
• Carissa Harris, Temple University, USA
• Jonathan Hsy, George Washington University, USA
• Roberta Magnani, Swansea University, UK
• Elizabeth Robertson, University of Glasgow, UK

Rethinking canonical, establishment authors and, where relevant, problematizing past approaches and assumptions. Projects in this strand deconstruct the canon from an “insider” position, one founded upon close attention to canonical texts and their authors. Volumes in this strand work to show both the richness of the material at hand, whilst also allowing for nontraditional and overlooked approaches with which to reconsider and reorient the canon itself.

We seek editors for the following volumes:

• Transgressive Chaucer
• Transgressive Gower
• Transgressive Langland
• Transgressive Arthur
• Transgressive Tristan
• Transgressive Marie de France
• Transgressive Christine de Pizan
• Transgressive Margery Kempe
• Transgressive Readers
• Transgressive Piety

Transgressive Canon (TC) volumes require an overall Introduction (typically produced by the volume editor) summarizing, if briefly, the ways in which a given author, text, or key concept has been understood in scholarship historically. Whilst there is no set structure for TC volumes, appropriate thematic groupings could include: 

• Author
• Key Texts
• Reader Reception
• Manuscripts and Material Culture
• Pedagogy (i.e., approaches to teach a given text or author). 

We invite applications from scholars who wish to take on the role of editor of any of our TC volumes. Alongside application for listed titles, we welcome pitches for volumes on relevant topics and authors. In both instances, please send a proposal portfolio, as detailed below, to Tyler Cloherty. Tyler is also happy to hear from scholars with queries about the series, TC volumes or the application process.

Please ensure that your proposal portfolio contains the following:

• Title of TC volume to which the proposal relates.
• 500-word statement of interest from the prospective editor: Why would the editor like to take on this particular TC volume? Why they are suited to do so?
• 500-word precis of volume ethos: How does this volume fit into or fill a gap in existing scholarship on its topic? How does the volume innovate and provide a new contribution to its topic? Why this topic, and why now? What are the key issues that need addressing, if we are to (re)consider this subject from an intersectional perspective?
• Prospective editor’s CV.
• Chapter abstracts (max. 250 words) and brief author bios (max. 150 words) for minimally three contributors who have confirmed their interest in publishing their work in the TC volume.
• Potential timeline for the volume, including date of manuscript delivery to the Press. This need not be the finalized timeline, but should be indicative of feasible deadlines for authors and editor(s). Key deadlines may relate to: circulation of a Call for Papers to source contributors; submission of first drafts to the editor; editor’s return of reviewed drafts with feedback to authors; submission of revised drafts to the editor; delivery of final manuscript to the Press.

Premodern Transgressive Literatures is committed to a transparent, ethical selection process. For that reason, we follow the steps below when selecting editors for TC volumes:

1. A prospective editor submits their proposal portfolio for a given TC volume (“TC X”). OR, the Academic Board invites a specific scholar to submit a proposal portfolio for TC X.
2. This triggers the circulation of a Call more generally for submissions to edit TC X. The Call will be distributed via scholarly email lists, and on relevant social media channels. The Call simply asks for submissions; it does not contain any “extra” information from the Board about TC X. Each Call will have a deadline for submitting applications of no less than 8 weeks hence.
3. Once the Call closes, the PTL Academic Board reviews all submitted proposals, and issues their decision in a timely manner, notifying all prospective editors of the outcome. We aim to make such decisions in 4-6 weeks from receipt of the proposals.
4. Responsibility for pulling TC X together is then handed over to the successful volume editor. The proposal portfolio should then form the basis of material for inclusion in the standard Medieval Institute Publications proposal form. The latter form represents the editor’s official submission to the Press to secure a contract for the volume. The form is straightforward, giving clear guidelines on required content and word limits for each section. Additional information required in this form includes: a full Table of Contents and details of confirmed contributors; more detail on the scope of the volume; marketing information, including potential competitors and unique selling points. 

Studies of subversive, understudied, and weird medieval texts are solicited here, drawing sustained attention to material which has otherwise been neglected, dismissed, or misunderstood. In parallel, this strand highlights innovations in methodological and theoretical approaches to premodern material, drawing out why such interventions are important and what they have to offer to today’s readers.

Extended discussions of transgressive and progressive pedagogy and scholarship in the Academy, including—e.g., teaching practices to combat white supremacy, talking about sexual assault in the classroom, and innovative methods to inspire a new generation of scholars. We also embrace projects which speak openly about what it means to transgress the normative blueprint of a “typical academic”—i.e., those of us who do not look much like the “default” of a cis-het able-bodied white older man, and how that impacts our careers, our pedagogy, and our scholarship.

Proposals or completed manuscripts to be considered for publication by Medieval Institute Publications should be sent to Tyler Cloherty, the acquisitions editors for the series.

Thinking Queerly: Medievalism, Wizardry, and Neurodiversity in Young Adult Texts

By Jes Battis

Why do we love wizards? Where do these magical figures come from? This volume traces the wizard from medieval Arthurian literature to contemporary young adult adaptations. By exploring the link between Merlin and Harry Potter, or Morgan la Fey and Sabrina, readers will see how the wizard offers spaces of hope and transformation for young readers. In particular, this book examines how wizards think differently, and how this difference can resonate with both LGBTQ and neurodivergent readers, who’ve been told they don’t fit in.

ISBN: 978-1-50152-189-8 (clothbound), 978-1-50151-533-0 (PDF), 978-1-50151-535-4 (EPUB) © 2021